Quote:
Originally Posted by SunnySide
So what exactly is going to be independently reviewed? Whether the Skins medical staff committed malpractice by not timely or properly diagnosing the tumor like a reasonably competent doctor would? That Trent was notified and any delay was on him? That Trent could wear a helmet and is lying?
I wonder who pays for this third party review? Is this coming out of the NFL's operating budget? Im sure the other 31 owners are so happy about this latest development with the Skins.
Yesh ... should have just traded the guy. But no, Bruce wanted to get into a pissing match with the greatest Skin over the past decade bc after 8 seasons with this team .. god forbid a 31 year old perennial pro bowler wanted to get out of this rot and actually have a window at a championship or at least competitive football.
Fuck you Bruce. |
I think Redskins is asking NFL and NFLPA to review everything in the bold part. I work in an integrated health center and we have a policy for whenever a patient got severely worst or died in our care (suicide attempt, bad medication reaction, and etc.), we will have a committee meeting to review the case fully and figure out whether if it was something we could have prevented or not, if so then what we can do to prevent it from happening again in the future. It is impossible to be 100% perfect with every treatment however, providers (doctors or medical staff) should do everything they can do to constantly improve their care. So, I think that's what Redskins is trying to find out, if it's something they could have done better or did they do everything they could do on their end.