Quote:
Originally Posted by SunnySide
Really? Thats surprising. He has been better than expected and can hold his own but I dont see him really move guys back or turning guys etc.
re this week, I looked up his snap count bc I know Christina played a good bit and found this.
Offensive Line (Team)- The team literally gained almost the exact same number of rushing yards after contact as they did total rushing yards (52 vs. 54 yards), which is not a good look for the O-line at all. The line was, at least, able to pave the way for first down runs on two of the team’s three short-yardage rushes.
Haskins was pressured on 32.6% of his dropbacks, which is not good, but isn’t a horrible showing, either. The problem was that the team gave up a season-high tying 6 sacks. Now the line wasn’t actually credited with allowing any of those sacks, but they certainly at least played some role in all of them.
https://www.hogshaven.com/2019/11/19...dskins-offense
6 sacks and none credited to any O line player? Seems odd. I now wonder how they determine who does and does not get credited w a sack.
Good for Donald. |
Good to see some data back what I'm seeing from Trey Quinn, from the link:
Trey Quinn- The Skins’ slot man was thrown at four times, but only ended up with 2 receptions for 9 yards. To make matters worse, one of those two incompletions ended up being picked off at Washington’s own 14-yard line. The lone bright spot for Quinn was that he scored on a two-point conversion in the fourth quarter; it was his first two-pointer as a pro.
I’ve been telling you how bad Quinn has been from an efficiency standpoint for weeks now. This time around, I thought I would change things up by not just telling you his rankings in a bunch of metrics, but by instead comparing him directly with the other efficiency cellar dwellers. Quinn and the four other players in the table below are the worst I could find. refer to the link, its terrible
I like the mullet, but this aint working out. Another Gruden Guy...