Thread: 3-4 vs. 4-3
View Single Post
Old 01-25-2020, 11:54 AM   #7
calia
Playmaker
 
calia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Woodside, CA
Age: 57
Posts: 3,755
Re: 3-4 vs. 4-3

Quote:
Originally Posted by AnonEmouse View Post
+1



Also means that barring BPA being an LB, we can spend a pick or 2 on the secondary and still have picks for the OL and TE. Or better still, go after a good S and/or CB (Jones?) in FA and spend the rest on O/BPA.


Improving the FS spot will be key too. With fewer LBs in coverage, the importance of someone at the S position with range is higher and that’s a big need.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
"Coach, what do you think of your team's execution?"
"I'm all for it." -- Coach McKay
calia is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
 
Page generated in 0.08328 seconds with 10 queries