Quote:
Originally Posted by SunnySide
Narrow view of just comments to the SCOTUS, Schumers words were more "attacking" but taking into the weight of the speaker, a sitting POTUS comments re wanting favorable treatment from his judges is more damaging then loose words from the Senate minority leader at a rally.
Broad view - Trump has used much worse, much more inciteful language so for anyone to try and claim Schumer's words are threats of violence ... it makes that person seem hallow and untruthful with actual honest discourse.
|
Again another BS equivalency and you throw in a personnel attack anybody disagreeing is moral low ground, therefore cant hold an opinion unless its in-line. Easy to see and point out...but this is the elitist-tone Obama ploy which essential got Trump elected.
Look, Schumer 1000% in the wrong. Trump has to personally attack individual justices for the equivalency. Simply do this, Mitch same speech about Gun Control being argued Supreme Court, and have him use the same language towards invoking name of 2 liberal justices. Then ask yourself, is that ok?