Chico, I'm not gonna debate you on this, so don't bother responding. I firmly believe Flynn was guilty, and just because some FBI agent wrote that they had a choice to make over whether to trap Flynn in a lie doesn't make the FBI guilty of anything.
Just gonna leave this here:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Barr's interview with CBS News
Barr and Trump hint at coming moves after Flynn is let off
Attorney General Bill Barr gave a television interview to defend his decision on Thursday to throw out the guilty plea of Michael Flynn for lying to the FBI about his contacts with the Russians. “People sometimes plead to things that turn out not to be crimes," said Barr, who argued that agents did not have a legitimate reason to question President Trump's then-national security adviser.
CBS News’s Catherine Herridge asked how he thinks history will remember such a stunning reversal, which has irked many career prosecutors inside the Justice Department.
“Well, history is written by the winner,” Barr replied. “So it largely depends on who's writing the history.”
The rest of the answer suggested that Barr intends to write it.
“I mean, it's not going to be the end of it,” the Trump appointee added, referring to letting Flynn off the hook. “We’re going to get to the bottom of what happened.”
|
Chico, I only hope that when the Dems get power again, whether it's 4 years or 8, you extend the same courtesy to us that you do this current administration. When a Democratic Congress tells Trump he can't nominate a SC justice because 8 months is not enough time to vet the nominee, or speed-rushes federal judiciary nominees that aren't worthy through the process to pack the courts, or even when the President's lapdog drops charges against corrupt Democrats because nothing, not even the judiciary, from the lowest federal judge to the Supreme Court, is exempt from partisanship anymore.
You're making the rules now, and you can bet your sweet ass we will play both those same rules when our time comes.