View Single Post
Old 01-19-2021, 10:12 AM   #122
sdskinsfan2001
Living Legend
 
sdskinsfan2001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Hanahan, South Carolina
Age: 42
Posts: 20,609
Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by AnonEmouse View Post
Just a musing really with Ingram being waived by Baltimore. Given that arguably Gibson and McKissick were the only effective running backs (Barber had a measly 2.7 ypc), would you consider bringing in a bruising vet like Ingram or look at picking up a big pound the rock back in a late round or UFA? Is Ingram too expensive?

For me I don't want a guy that's just moderately effective in short yardage, I want a guy I can put on the field at any time and threaten to get good yardage. Even if we maintain what is effectively RB by committee, I think we need an upgrade on Barber.
Barber was EXTREMELY effective in short yardage. He was valuable. I wouldn't draft another RB or bring in an expensive guy to try and replace him. You can bring bring in some UDFA type guys for competition. I actually like our RB group. Run it back with them 1 more year.
__________________
"You can be my wingman anytime."
"Bulls**t. You can be mine."
sdskinsfan2001 is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
 
Page generated in 0.60472 seconds with 10 queries