Quote:
Originally Posted by BaltimoreSkins
I think value wise Wentz puts you in a better position to win games than two third rounders so the cost doesn’t bother me.
|
That's the rational way to look at this.
The irrational way is to feel disappointment that we didn't get one of the big fish (Rodgers Wilson Watson), and let that cloud our evaluation of Wentz himself.
If Wentz sucks, you'll be picking in the top 10 next year, and you can cut him with no cap problems. In position to solve QB then in the draft.
Have you landed a guy that makes you a super bowl contender? Probably not. That's why the disappointment, he's not Russell Wilson.