[Giantone]

Originally Posted by Chico23231

Lol…as we know, there wasn’t any Russian collusion, the Steele dos was false and the liars were anyone in congress who claimed to had seen evidence trump colluded with russia.

We know from recent testimony that this was just Democrat oppo and the FBI review it and said there was no evidence long before Mueller came along.

The problem is this, if you are a respectable news organization you are suppose to present the facts and investigate the evidence. The NYT did not…only after the Muller report was released did they admit the Steele Dos was discredited

The NYT pushed a conspiracy theory and false narratives that aligned with their political biased simply because they didn’t like Trump.

Folks actually still believe this Russian collusion nonsense, which is the biggest disinformation political campaign of my lifetime.

And media wonders why we don’t believe them or why our faith in institutions are failing to record lows.

LOL I love how you play the "collusion" BS . Mueller proved Russia intervened on trumps behalf and it was his kids that were the middle men Barr just wouldn't indicted.




What's this we shit??? .............you keep proving you know shit!