Quote:
Originally Posted by mooby
Sorry Chief, I'm going off Toomey's official statement here.
From my understanding, he's saying in its' current form this bill will enable 10 years of spending totally unrelated to veterans. This is kind of going over my head a bit, but it sounds like he's saying there is 400 billion in current discretionary spending that is covered under mandatory spending in this new bill - so how does that translate to freeing up 400 billion in loose change for Congress to spend on whatever they want with no oversight? |
Admittedly, this is going a bit over my head as well. It's not easy to follow/track.
Page two of the first link I sent outlines Increases in Direct Spending.
Mandatory—or direct—spending includes spending for entitlement programs and certain other payments to people, businesses, and state and local governments. Mandatory spending is generally governed by statutory criteria; it is not normally set by annual appropriation acts.
That is the only thing I can think of (or find) that he may be referring to, as it adds up to about $400 billion.