Thread: Cards post game
View Single Post
Old 09-11-2023, 06:52 PM   #2
punch it in
From a Land Down Under
 
punch it in's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: toms river, nj
Age: 54
Posts: 24,147
Cards post game

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruhskins View Post
I'm not getting my panties in a bunch because you're disagreeing with me.

I don't think Martin was the best pick, but I also don't think picking an o-lineman was the sure fire answer you think it would have been.

You think Ron is the worst coach in the league, but somehow him picking an offensive lineman in the 2nd round would have worked out?

Sent from my SM-S911U using Tapatalk

Well when you tell someone they are “yapping” it turns from a discussion into a bunched panties situation.

You’re putting alot of words in my mouth so Ill try to explain what I am saying. Which, I believe a lot of people, even in this forum, are saying. Like Meks just did as I was writing this.

I never said anything was a sure fire answer because as we all know nothing is a sure thing BUT it is pretty fuckin clear where our main deficiency lies. It was pretty clear where it lied during the draft. O line. So with more than one highly graded olineman available, yes taking a dback was a head scratcher. Now after what we saw yesterday it is a problem. Would Mauch, or Torrence have made a difference? Who knows? Im simply saying that reaching on a dback when there were higher graded players at a position of actual need was and is silly.

Also, I never said Ron was “the worst coach in the league “. I said he was not a good one. Not sure many people disagree with that either.

Not yapping. Not doom and gloom. Simply wondering, like many other fans why we didn’t address the oline more seriously because it was a shit show last year. We had a decent secondary and took Forbes in the first. Taking Martin in the second was unnecessary and counter productive. That is all. Don’t mean im not a true fan or a crybaby. Lol. Simply means I think they dropped the ball on that pick. And as Meks pointed out, why not take a shot at improving the oline instead of depth in the secondary? At least if it didn’t work out the pick made sense.
punch it in is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
 
Page generated in 0.51987 seconds with 10 queries