Quote:
|
Originally Posted by canthetuna
Hey ass... lets not resort to name calling... Gibbs looked pissed when the whole thing came to his attention, and I am a huge Lavar fan, but when he was running his mouth during the season on the radio... he didn't play. When he shut up and talked about the next game's preparations... he played.
If you noticed I didnt say he wouldnt play... I just said I wasn't sure... as you are not sure either.... so make sure you have a comprehensive grasp of the context of the one sentance I typed before you go off calling me moronic and dumb.
Thank you.
|
What?
Where did I assert that you said he wouldn't play?
My comments were in response to your assertion that Gibbs could not play Lavar because he was upset that Lavar made some controversial statements. Where did I lose the context on that one skippy? That is exactly what you said.
To me, and probably many others, that thought pattern is simply dumb and moronic. Sorry but if it looks like a duck...
And your assertion as to why Lavar didn't play earlier is spot off. Lavar admitted he was wrong during the situation and probably wasn't 100% healthy and ready mentally to contribute. You immediately place yourself in the dumb and moronic group of people on this site who for months have asserted that Gibbs would ever decide whether to play or not play a guy based on anything but his on-field production. I can't even grasp why people would think this about him but they do and it is dumb and moronic.