Quote:
|
Originally Posted by H4172teh5k1n5
The SeaHawks played only 5 teams w/ a winning record this year (Jags, Skins, Cowboys, Giants, & Indy). If you count the Falcons ( 8-8 ) it was 6.
The 'Skins by comparison played 8 w/ a winning record, and played 2 of those teams twice (so 10 if your going by games against winning teams).
Do the math. We played as many winning teams as they played losing teams.
The SeaHawks had the 32nd hardest schedule while the Redskins had the 4th (that's right, Seattle had the easiest schedule in the NFL!!!!)
The Seahawks beat only 1 team w/ a top ten defence, Dallas, whom we beat twice. 5 of their wins came from the worst 3 defences in the NFL (SF, STL, & HUSTON)
Excluding the IND game (because they didn't play their starters) Hasselbeck averaged a passer rating of only 74.5 against teams w/ a winning record (Arizona's Josh McCown finish the season ranked 24th w/ a passer ranking of 74.9). Alexander averaged 85.5 yards per game against teams w/ a winning record (again excluding the IND game).
The Seahawks are not for real. They have fooled everyone into thinking they are worth something by beating some of the worst teams in the NFL. Beating SF by only 2 points in their first match up is ridiculous. If SF had made their 2 point conversion, it would have gone into overtime. That's sad!!! Enjoy your short stay in the playoffs Seattle. The Redskins are about to show the rest of the NFL what a fake you really are.
|
Very good, and I agree with everything.
Looks like the squaks are in for a rude awakening....at least, I hope so....