Re: Sean Salisbury makes a bold statement make him remember it
What's funny is, although I don't care for Salisbury at all, it was Michael Irvin of all people, who had some fairly reasonable and accurate things to say about the Redskins when most didn't give us a chance.
You would have thought that Salisbury and Tom Jackson would have been more correct in their analysis and Irvin would have been the "talking head", but it was just the other way around.
When he renegged on his walk from CT to DC and then later said after our loss to Seattle that we had no business being in the playoffs, there's no way this guy has been watching the same Redskins as we have.
|