Quote:
|
Originally Posted by offiss
Again ridiculous, you fall right back into the same nonesense, are you saying you can't see the difference between the 2.
Brady plays to win, Brunell plays not to lose.
Brady attacks, Brunell leaves it for the defense.
Basically what you want to hear is if Brady wins and throws for 350 yards a 4 td's and beats the Steelers 28-24, and Brunell throws for 49 yards, and the defense scores 2 TD's and we beat the 49ers 14 nothing, I should give Brunell Brady type status because they both won? :frusty:
|
Actually your whole argument is ridiculous.
If you read your previous post. You mentioned how the Pats defense was banged up and wasn't stellar until the end of the year, but you wouldn't give Brunell the same benefit of the doubt when he was in a very similiar situation.
Again my issue isn't trying to compare Brunell v. Brady, as much as I'm trying to show you how much you reall don't like him, though you will never say that. It seems you pick and choose your facts to suit your argument, when you really need to admit Mark Brunell had a good year.