Commanders Post at The Warpath - View Single Post

Monksdown · 01-23-2006, 02:25 PM

I dont think you will find many coaches, that short of injury to the vet with those numbers, would agree with you.

And I love you to death, but when you spend billions of dollars on something, and you have a million+ people counting on you. I wouldn't be able to go to sleep whispering to myself, "if ben roethlisburger did it, then so can Jason." Ben is a statistical wack job. You simply can never expect something even close to that.

I dont discount that you could be right, but id say there is probably a 90-98% chance, you are way off.

When somebody performs as advertised, you do not pull him. You do not pull him. I wish Mark was my daddy.

We are building for the Divison Title, and the Superbowl next year. By starting your unproven, no experienced qb, your new goal is to be above .500, and then the playoffs. Mark is playoff bound again next year, homies.

01-23-2006, 02:25 PM	#81
Monksdown The Starter Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Warrenton, Virginia Age: 45 Posts: 1,515	Re: Campbell or Brunell in 2006? I dont think you will find many coaches, that short of injury to the vet with those numbers, would agree with you. And I love you to death, but when you spend billions of dollars on something, and you have a million+ people counting on you. I wouldn't be able to go to sleep whispering to myself, "if ben roethlisburger did it, then so can Jason." Ben is a statistical wack job. You simply can never expect something even close to that. I dont discount that you could be right, but id say there is probably a 90-98% chance, you are way off. When somebody performs as advertised, you do not pull him. You do not pull him. I wish Mark was my daddy. We are building for the Divison Title, and the Superbowl next year. By starting your unproven, no experienced qb, your new goal is to be above .500, and then the playoffs. Mark is playoff bound again next year, homies.