Quote:
|
Originally Posted by onlydarksets
Those are good points, but the process can be improved drastically with one change in the rules. Per the HOF website:
There is no reason Peter King (or anyone) needs to be on the Board for more than 3-5 years at a stretch. |
Why? I think having people on the board for longer periods of time provides the committee with members that have a sense of history and a better sense for comparison across eras. IMO, it seems that today most people think that nothing in sports happened before 2000.
AM's best bet is for old timers like King who actually saw him play as compared to newbees that think barry sanders is old-school.