Fair enough, Saden. I can see that working, but I would like to see less extreme sharing than those numbers you used in your example. (even though we still had twice as much as the Bengals
)
And Saden, if you want a strong league, which we all do, my theory is that saying flat out NO to revenue sharing would force the issue on the smaller market team owners. The issue being that they either try and maximize their potential market, like Danny boy, or suffer the financial consequences (which might make them want to sell the team to an owner who might actually give a damn.)