Thread: Revenue Sharing
View Single Post
Old 03-07-2006, 08:53 PM   #17
CRT3
Impact Rookie
 
CRT3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Rockville
Age: 62
Posts: 795
Re: Revenue Sharring

Quote:
Originally Posted by saden1
Absolutely not! You want to charge poor people in Cincinnati the same amount you would people in Norther Virginia and Maryland who happen to have 5 of the top 15 highest-income counties by per capita income in the United States? You'll be breaking all the rules of economics and not only that but you won't have people going to games in Cincy and you won't be making as much money as you could in Virgina.
Yo dude there are a higher amount of poor people in PG County and DC then in Cincinati. There are poor people everywhere. IF you want to have complete sharring and equal revenues for all then prices should be equal period.

If you go by your theory then the Redskins should be able to keep more money cause of there demographics. I don't think the owners will make their decesion based on demos.
__________________
16-0 for 2007
CRT3 is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
 
Page generated in 0.90306 seconds with 10 queries