Commanders Post at The Warpath - View Single Post

That Guy · 03-13-2006, 07:48 PM

clark WAS a liability in coverage and against big running backs (getting bowled over). arch is also a liability in coverage.

they offered clark a contract, they obviously think he's a good guy to have, BUT if you don't have a 5-7 year deal, you might not be a core redskin

the team would like him back, but they can't offer him the starting role, so he's going to look elsewhere.

03-13-2006, 07:48 PM	#11
That Guy Living Legend Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: VA Age: 42 Posts: 17,620	Re: Ryan Clark clark WAS a liability in coverage and against big running backs (getting bowled over). arch is also a liability in coverage. they offered clark a contract, they obviously think he's a good guy to have, BUT if you don't have a 5-7 year deal, you might not be a core redskin the team would like him back, but they can't offer him the starting role, so he's going to look elsewhere.