[warriorzpath]

The media always seems to dismiss that their biased opinions and comments exist, even though most of the nfl/sportswriters attempt to ridicule the redskins whenever they get a chance. The redskins have been easy targets since Dan Snyder took over because he was young and inexperienced and also the brash way he did business. They have been targeted also because of jealousy because of the past success the redskins have had in winning 3 superbowls and numerous playoff/championships - and also the jealousy of the owner's money and his willingness to spend.



The only things that will stop them is: the redskins winning the superbowl and me,as a fan, ignoring any ridiculous comments that are made about the redskins until and after they win the superbowl. I am going to start focusing on what is good about the redskins, instead of letting the writers influence me to thinking that the redskins are and will never amount to anything ever again. Because that's what they're trying to do individually - get us to focus on all the redskins' negative stuff... ie - Arrington drama, Brunnel/offense fading down the stretch, Sean Taylor's behavior and legal problems, (always future) cap problems, only one productive wr, not enough draft picks, and on and on and on. This past successful season of (just to mention a few general ones) greatly improving the offense, continuing to be defensively successful, winning 10 regular season games, winning the last 5 games, going to playoffs and winning a game and doing well in the playoffs is dismissed by the media and a negative is replaced in it's place - all of them.

I don't know about all of you, but I'm literally sick of this and I'm going to stop reading certain reporters' pieces because of the negative spin of everything redskins.

Here's a list I am starting for myself to boycott:
Len Pasquarelli
Tom Jackson
Sean Salisbury
Prisco
Peter King