Commanders Post at The Warpath - View Single Post

Huddle · 03-16-2006, 12:34 AM

Schneed 10, sorry for the delayed response. I didn't see your post until now.

That statement right there is a contender for the Schneed10 smackdown of the day award.

Oh no! Not the dreaded smackdown award!

Some dumbass in Green Bay? Um at the time, that would have been Mike Holmgren. And at the time, he let Brunell go because HE HAD BRETT FAVRE. Who only led the team to a Super Bowl victory, of all things.

Yeah...and if you have two very good quarterbacks on your team the smart thing to do is to trade one?

Jesus H Christ. I can't believe what I'm reading.

You forgot the three exclamation points.

But let's go with the Green Bay comparison for a minute.

Let's not since the rest of your post involves hypotheticals based on the unsupported premise that a team with two good quarterbacks should trade one away.

03-16-2006, 12:34 AM	#124
Huddle Special Teams Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 352	Re: Who starts at QB? Schneed 10, sorry for the delayed response. I didn't see your post until now. That statement right there is a contender for the Schneed10 smackdown of the day award. Oh no! Not the dreaded smackdown award! Some dumbass in Green Bay? Um at the time, that would have been Mike Holmgren. And at the time, he let Brunell go because HE HAD BRETT FAVRE. Who only led the team to a Super Bowl victory, of all things. Yeah...and if you have two very good quarterbacks on your team the smart thing to do is to trade one? Jesus H Christ. I can't believe what I'm reading. You forgot the three exclamation points. But let's go with the Green Bay comparison for a minute. Let's not since the rest of your post involves hypotheticals based on the unsupported premise that a team with two good quarterbacks should trade one away.