Quote:
Originally Posted by amorentz
When cases are dismissed for lack of evidence, it is usually because the evidence being offered is found inadmissable.
|
So let me kind of get a handle on this, a case only gets dismissed on technicalities that find evidence/witnesses inadmissible (looking at it from the judge's eyes, probably to the point where they have no evidence/witnesses) . Or only if there are technicalities of wrong doing on the part of the prosecution that appear to be intentional.
And it has nothing to do with the merit of the case on either side ?