Quote:
|
Originally Posted by That Guy
I think ramsey -> collins is hardly an upgrade... more like a wash at best. Lavar -> Mcintosh is a clear downgrade, at least for this year since rocky is going to have to deal with rookie lumps and lavar (though slow) actually played pretty well down the stretch.
we also upgraded our coverage and return units again. mcintosh, havner, doughty, chijioke and possibly a guy like lumsden could all really help there. Not to mention:
--KR/PR = Antwaan Randle-El ( >>>>>>>>>>>> Antonio Brown)
which is important not to overlook... too bad we didn't fix kicker/punter  , maybe next year. |
I am concerned about our ROLB, but that's really it.
My point was - Can the Cowboys really say that there is not a single position at which there are question marks? Who do they have backing up Drew Bledsoe? Henson/Romo? Do they really have fewer question marks than the Skins? I just don't understand the argument that they have filled more holes in the offseason than the Skins.
Maybe somebody who knows the Cowboys a bit better can weigh in about their holes (not just WR, yeah yeah we know that one) and how they fixed them. Sure, they get TO, they pick up some help on the Oline (while also losing Larry Allen), and then Vanderjagt. I'm supposed to believe these are the only holes on the team?
Being a Redskins fan, I'm used to getting slapped in the face by the media. I'm over that. I'm just trying to understand the argument.