View Single Post
Old 06-01-2006, 03:36 AM   #14
MightyJoeGibbs
The Starter
 
MightyJoeGibbs's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: B-More, the backdoor for the Redskins Community
Age: 45
Posts: 1,087
Re: Is James Thrash more Buck for the Bang?!?

Quote:
Originally Posted by DCsports
Lets face it.....James Thrash is getting old and his salary is increasing
reasons to drop James Thrash
1) Redskins have better offensive weapons than Thrash :
Our Redskin recievers (Moss, Lloyd, and Randel El) and Tight End (Chris Cooley) are all extremely talented players. James Thrash is not very talented
2) He could be considered as a good Special Teams Player......but lets get down to earth now, we HAVE RANDEL EL for Special Teams. Thrash is no longer needed. And if you go back and watch thrash's kick and escpecially punt returning he was pretty bad.
3) If we get rid of Thrash we can use his salary to bring better players to the Redskins team
4) Thrash is injury prone
5) Redskins have plenty of depth on the offensive end
James Trash as he may be deserves to put a ring on his finger for endouring the drought. He has heart and Better keep making takles on special teams
MightyJoeGibbs is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
 
Page generated in 0.91094 seconds with 10 queries