Quote:
Originally Posted by Grim21Reaper
My original point was that the defense would have been better last year and this year with those guys. The defense with Pierce was 3rd in the NFL. They were top 10 last year and a disappointment this year. I would rather have the 2004 version. If you don't agree, argue with the numbers.
|
That's all speculative on your part, nobody can say for sure what would have happened had we kept them.
I still don't understand the logic of wanting to keep Pierce at a much higher price tag for a job that was done almost as equally well by Marshall at a much lower figure.
As for Smoot, Rogers became his replacement and is a better fit. He's still young, but his upside is much larger.