Thread: Monk vs Reed
View Single Post
Old 10-03-2006, 03:16 PM   #1
LBrown43
Special Teams
 
LBrown43's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Clinton (as in Portis) New Jersey
Age: 64
Posts: 217
Monk vs Reed

So talk is that Andre Reed is a chinch for the Hall of Fame. WHY?????
He was never on a Super Bowl Winner. His numbers are almost the same as Art's except he had 19 more TD's. The only reason he had more TD's is he was the only reciever of any note on the Bills. In Art's tenure we had Saunders and Clark among others who were gifted guys. Otherwise their numbers are very similar.
I just don't get it. Here you have a guy like Art Monk that is/was the epitomy of class and grace and he gets slapped in the face. Reed was a hot head (wasn't it Reed who got upset in the Super Bowl and cost his team the game by jerking off his helmet?)
I just don't get it. I am not saying he was not a great reciever because he was. I just see very little difference between him and Art and really feel that Art should have been a first ballot guy.
I know I am preching to the choir here but I just don't get the brush off Art gets. Whats not to love about the guy!!!
LBrown43 is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
 
Page generated in 1.21934 seconds with 10 queries