View Single Post
Old 11-01-2006, 07:54 AM   #66
illdefined
Playmaker
 
illdefined's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: nyc
Age: 49
Posts: 2,631
Re: ROMO??? Why not JC???

would it make a difference if these things were said by NFL insiders instead of posters on Warpath? from the WP:

"Saunders's high-powered offenses in Kansas City liked to stretch the field with long passes, but his game plans in Washington have been tailored to what Brunell does best -- throwing short passes. Two general managers said they believed Brunell, not a pure drop-back passer, was a poor fit for Saunders's preferred mode of attack, noting that he appears unwilling or unable to thread passes through tight spots over the middle or throw the ball deep downfield."

or

"An offense full of playmakers has no one making plays. Even those who once assumed they would be at the heart of the attack, like Portis, wonder where or when they will fit in."

"You start to question whether you're the person for the offense," Portis said. "If everybody was getting the ball and if everybody was doing good, then this offense would be great. But being that we're not, we have that conflict."


funny, i read this article for the first time this morning..
__________________
a fan. not a cheerleader.
illdefined is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
 
Page generated in 1.00387 seconds with 10 queries