Quote:
Originally Posted by RobH4413
Tripp, seriously dude. It's OKAY to be wrong sometimes.
Your supposed to use stats as evidence to back up observed behavior... not to back up pre-determined biased "theories" that simply don't exist...
You're manipulating evidence to suit your argument... not changing your argument to suit your evidence...
I love the passion and effort you put into posting, and I love hearing your opinion. I just think your taking this Brunell issue a little too personal and it's clouding your characterstically objective opinion.
All Love-
|
I see what you are saying.
I disagree that I'm being biased at all in this arguement. I mean, I've changed my positions as the evidence warrented I do so. I was opposed to the change pre Sunday, and now after watching Campbell play, I support it. That's not biased, that's objective.
I think a good point would be that maybe I'm spending too much time argueing something insignificant. I'm losing interest, not because anyone has even brought out a counter point to make me remotely consider that my position on Brunell's performance is wrong, but because in the grand scheme of things, it really doesn't matter who's QBing this team, we are still going to struggle with this D. I hold that position, and for someone who does, I certainly do spend a lot of my time argueing an insignifcant point.
But, I'm not sure I feel right letting it go.
Also I really am not manipulating any evidence whatsoever. I tend to only present my side, if that's what you are saying. That doesn't mean I'm ignoring the other evidence, I've probably considered it before stating my position.
If I was wrong, I'd be the first one to admit it.