Commanders Post at The Warpath - View Single Post - Is this really fair? (Saint's Thomas suspended for 'roids)

mike340 · 12-06-2006, 10:09 PM

Haven't we heard many times about contaminated supplements causing a positive drug test (in various sports.) Yet with all these occurrences I can't recall a single instance where a supplement was named, either at the time of the positive test or later. My feeling is that this is a way athletes have found to convert themselves from cheaters to victims. Is there any reason that anyone has heard why none of the "offending" supplements has ever (to the best of my knowledge) been named? (I am running with BleedBurgundy's post above.)

12-06-2006, 10:09 PM	#27
mike340 Special Teams Join Date: Jun 2006 Age: 68 Posts: 322	Re: Is this really fair? (Saint's Thomas suspended for 'roids) Haven't we heard many times about contaminated supplements causing a positive drug test (in various sports.) Yet with all these occurrences I can't recall a single instance where a supplement was named, either at the time of the positive test or later. My feeling is that this is a way athletes have found to convert themselves from cheaters to victims. Is there any reason that anyone has heard why none of the "offending" supplements has ever (to the best of my knowledge) been named? (I am running with BleedBurgundy's post above.)