Re: AFC vs. NFC...
I've always liked the NFC, obviously because of the Redskins, but as much as it pains me to say, the AFC is far more dominant. For starters, 7 of the last 10 Super Bowls have been won by AFC teams.
Take a look around this season: with the exception of New Orleans, every high-powered offense in the league is an AFC team. The only two NFC teams that I think are genuinely good and have a chance are New Orleans (great offense, though the 5-10 Redskins beat them) and Chicago, with it's brutal defense, though they have a lame duck at QB.
The AFC has Indianapolis, San Diego, Baltimore, New England, Denver and Cincinnati are always competitive and Tennessee has been on one hell of a hot streak recently.
I think the majority of the talent lies in the AFC right now, especially a majority of the consistently competitive teams like Indy, New England, Denver, etc. The NFC seems to have a lot of teams that come out of nowhere for a season and disappear just as quickly next season.
__________________
Your post count, reputation score, popularity ranking, VIP tag or funny signature has no bearing on how I value you as an individual.
|