Quote:
Originally Posted by TAFKAS
So we hear a lot of talk about chemistry, and lack thereof on the Redskins because of constant player turnover, and how this lack of chemistry has led to inner turmoil and losing. By the same token though, the Pats are often changing players yet they continue to win.
So here's my question for the group. Does chemistry breed winning? Or winning breed chemistry?
|
Here is the difference. Great coaching, Tom Brady and mainstays on the defensive line and linebackers. For all the praise Brady gets and it is well deserved, people don't mention Richard Seymour, Ty Warren, Vince Wolfolk, and Marquis Hill. Plus Vrabel and Bruschi have been solid. NE has had some turnover but they have also kept some real solid core guys too.