Quote:
Originally Posted by wilsowilso
Let's see I started this thread so I figure I've backed up my opinion plenty. The problem is you are "trying to end this" as you say with garbage arguments, nonsensical gibberish, absurd reasoning and plenty of smoke and mirrors. Let me ask you three questions? Do you always laugh at your own jokes? Were you on the high school jv debate team? Do you smoke Crank, Crack and or Ice? Obviously we can go on and on, but I promise you one of us will never budge in their argument and it's not me. Why don't we talk on Sunday night? It's a real big game in this debate. One more question. Is your last name Manning?
|
No, no, no, and uh, no. It's not Brunell either.
I'm a pretty crappy debater (as anyone in debate can plainly see). I just know my football and am passionate about it.
When did I try to end this? I asked you point blank why record was significant to future performance and have no answer yet. This post tells me that you simply don't understand my points. Either you aren't intelligent enough, or you simply don't want to stress yourself to think outside of the box woven for you by the talking heads, but thats not my place to decide that. Either way, we can't have a debate if you are unwilling to budge from your position under any circumstance.
Your arguement thus far reminds me of Dr. Z argueing that Monk shouldn't be in the hall. For a decade now, hes stated that people who catch 8 yd hitch routes for a living shouldnt be in the hall with no exception. It seems to be the only thing he ever says about Monk, and for whatever reason, many people agree with his weak postion.
You started this thread after Brady had a poor game. Already, I'm thinking you might have a tendency to misjudge QB performance, but who knows, you could have had some deep philosophical reasoning to back up why Brady is the games best QB.
So I inquired. I got the expected 3 rings arguement, explained to you exactly why that was worthless, then we moved on to the only slightly better team record debate, without ever touching my central point that Manning's performance is better. Even if you factor the playoffs in with his regular season production, his performance is still better. We then started talking exclusively playoffs, and all I got was the "record+this debate is over formula". If you truely think that Brady has some magical playoff power that seperates him from Manning (I don't), thats what we should be debating. I asked you about this point blank, and you've yet to respond.
It is to my knowledge at this point that you have nothing more to bring to this debate. Why debate it any further? If I'm wrong and you do have extra insight, this would be the time for it.
Thank you.