View Single Post
Old 01-22-2007, 01:17 PM   #15
firstdown
Living Legend
 
firstdown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 61
Posts: 15,817
Re: Vick's Bottle Tested Negative

Quote:
Originally Posted by sportscurmudgeon View Post
OJ Simpson is innocent too - - right? That's what the law says so it has to be so.

There is a real difference between what someone does and what a prosecutor can prove beyond a shadow of a doubt in court - - particularly if that someone had a boatload of cash and can get expensively lawyered up.

If - I said IF - Michael Vick or any other well known sports star or celebrity has a water bottle with a fake compartment in his/her possession and tries to sneak it onto an aircraft in 2007, then that person is a moron.

Not a thug; not a criminal; not a sociopath. But a M-O-R-O-N.
I agree it was stupid what he did but how many regular flights has Vick been on over the past couple of years? I'm sure most of his travel is either private planes or flying with the team so he may not have known that a water bottle was a no go. I think that law is fairly new in the past 12 months when that group was caught plotting to make those liquid bombs this year (2006).
firstdown is offline  

Advertisements
 
Page generated in 0.70464 seconds with 10 queries