Quote:
Originally Posted by Beemnseven
Let's look at it this way: Which of Turner's teams had the most talent?
Answer: The '99 team. He finally got hold of a proven, veteran quarterback who made good decisions and still had enough of an arm to get his offense down the field. They found themselves a steal of a running back in the 4th round with Stephen Davis who turned out to be the perfect fit with an offensive line built to pound the ball. Westbrook and Connell had hit their peak at just the right time and found the right chemistry with Brad Johnson.
On the defensive side, they were mediocre to put it nicely. They gave up a ton of points.
Norv took that team to the second round of the playoffs with a banged up Stephen Davis and a seriously flawed defense.
From 1994-1998 he did about what could be expected from just about any head coach. And in 2000, there were 3 or 4 wins that got away because Sndyeratto decided not to pursue a kicker.
It was time for Norv to leave, I'll admit. I just don't think the man is the imbecile everyone else makes him out to be.
|
I remember a few tough losses in 2000, can't remember how many I could put on the kicker, but I can remember a couple on Stephen Davis fumbles.
that year we beat 4 of the best teams in football, including both super bowl teams, but we couldn't win the 'easy' games. Is that coaching? I don't know if you could put it all on Norv, but I also don't think it wasn't only the Danny that thought he couldn't handle his team. Seems the opinion was shared by many in the league.
Maybe SD feels its his time & they have enough confidence in their personnel to get it done next year regardless of Norv's track record. The inside word on him is probably pretty favorable.
How have teams done after Marty left? Cleveland, KC & Skins; I don't remember any having a winning record. Marty may be a tough act to follow.