Quote:
Originally Posted by CanadianSkin
Don Banks strikes again. Here is what he had to say about Bly and Smoot. Wow he has a mad on for us.
7. The Lions trading Dre' Bly -- It seems to me that Bly quickly showed his true colors by complaining that he wanted Detroit to trade him to Washington rather than Denver, because the Redskins were willing to give him a new contract and the Broncos aren't. Show me a guy who'd rather play for the perennially losing Redskins than the perennially winning Broncos and I'll show you the type of player that Lions coach Rod Marinelli is trying to weed out of his locker room. At the very least, Detroit got a potential starter at offensive tackle ( George Foster) and running back ( Tatum Bell) in the Bly trade, which gives them lots of options at No. 2 in the draft.
Minnesota cut its losses with the clueless Fred Smoot.
Here is the link: SI.com - Writers - Early reviews are in (cont.) - Tuesday March 6, 2007 12:57PM |
As far as I'm concerned, there really are no perennial losers or winners. It's all about who wins the Super Bowl. If you step back and look at it, all the teams were losers except the Colts.
With parity each year in this league, you never know what team is going to be this year's Titans or 49ers, teams that show marked improvement upon their previous year. Hell, you never know who is going to be your 2005 Redskins. The Broncos always make the playoffs and always bow out before winning anything big.
Before someone spouts off that bullshit rhetoric, you might want to be a little more objective.