Commanders Post at The Warpath - View Single Post

SC Skins Fan · 04-16-2007, 12:26 PM

You know to actually make this trade work as far as the 'Draft Value Chart' the Pats would have to include both of their #1's (24 and 28) (740pts and 660pts) as well as their #3 (91) (136pts) AND their #4 (127) (45pts). Which would bring them to 1581, which would still if you want to get really technical leave them 19 pts short of the #6 value of 1600 ... which they could make up by including their compensatory pick in the 5th round (171) (23pts).

So ...

To actual satisfy the value as dictated by the draft value chart the Pats would have to give the Skins their two firsts, their third, fourth, and fifth round picks. Which would leave the Pats with less draft picks than the Skins currently hold (the Pats have no #2). Obviously the value chart is a guide, but if it shows you how valuable the #6 pick is and how jealously the Skins ought to guard it if they really want to get proper value in return.

I don't, however, forsee Roger Goodell saying ...

"We have a trade ... the Patriots move to #6, in return the Redskins receive picks #24, #28, #91, #127, and #171." I guess you could talk about picks in future years, but man this would be a complicated trade.

04-16-2007, 12:26 PM	#45
SC Skins Fan The Starter Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: South Carolina Posts: 1,555	Re: Interesting mock draft You know to actually make this trade work as far as the 'Draft Value Chart' the Pats would have to include both of their #1's (24 and 28) (740pts and 660pts) as well as their #3 (91) (136pts) AND their #4 (127) (45pts). Which would bring them to 1581, which would still if you want to get really technical leave them 19 pts short of the #6 value of 1600 ... which they could make up by including their compensatory pick in the 5th round (171) (23pts). So ... To actual satisfy the value as dictated by the draft value chart the Pats would have to give the Skins their two firsts, their third, fourth, and fifth round picks. Which would leave the Pats with less draft picks than the Skins currently hold (the Pats have no #2). Obviously the value chart is a guide, but if it shows you how valuable the #6 pick is and how jealously the Skins ought to guard it if they really want to get proper value in return. I don't, however, forsee Roger Goodell saying ... "We have a trade ... the Patriots move to #6, in return the Redskins receive picks #24, #28, #91, #127, and #171." I guess you could talk about picks in future years, but man this would be a complicated trade. __________________ It has taken a long time, but I have finally realized that nothing I say about the Redskins will have any effect upon anything the Redskins do.