Quote:
Originally Posted by mooby
I like what you said too, although I'm not too high on Landry. I'll wait and see what he plays like before I reserve judgement. I just think that having Landry, who is similar to Taylor in the fact that he's a big hitter and a flashy guy, isn't the guy who will help Taylor back there. We need a guy to complement Taylor's attributes, not someone who plays the same as him. I could and (hopefully) will be wrong when I say that, but i'm not too high on that pick as of now.
|
I agree. Archuleta was supposed to be the same thing for our defense but he was miserable in coverage, fitting more into a scheme where he plays in the box instead of cover 2. However, I do get the impression that Landry is more of a hybrid, a guy who excels in zone coverage, makes interceptions, and clobbers people too. His one susceptibility could be man coverage, which hopefully our safeties will not be asked to do much.