|
Re: Santana vs. Randy
If were going to blame Brunell for the lack of Moss's production last year..... Its amazing Randy Moss even caught a ball with his situation in Oakland.
Really this is an interesting debate, because you're really looking at two different type of recivers. I don't think there is a better reciver at adjusting to the football in the NFL than Santana Moss. If you look at alot of the catches he makes.... a lot of times he is covered almost perfectly, but he can find this werid way to adapt to the play and make the catch. Randy is kinda of a reciver where if you can cover him, you can have him beat. The problem is (during his prime), he's nearly impossible to cover. Given the last two years (I was actually more impressed with Santana in 06' than 05' given the circumstances) I think Santana Moss gets the edge, but when both in their absolute prime, theres no question.
Man this "Moss" stuff gets confusing.
__________________
#21
|