Thread: D. Blaylock
View Single Post
Old 05-05-2007, 02:06 PM   #36
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,845
Re: D. Blaylock

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
I'm just say this to get it out of the way, because I know someone will bring it up. Just keep in mind, I don't really agree with this, I just know it will inevitably be brought up. Here goes...

Getting Blaylock gives us the flexibility now to trade Betts and seek help on the D-line.
Good point.

You can't rule anything out at this point.

JLC mentioned that the Skins coaches definitely are not 100% content with the defensive line as is.

Quote:
Contrary to what some shills would have you believe, there is stil a definite and well-accpeted need along the D Line among the staff. Obviously, Coach Joe and the gang don't come right out in front of cameras and say what's still flawed with their team, and of course they would not publicly speak ill of their work this offseason, but that's where reporting and critical thought come in. Seems easy enough to grasp, but, alas, for some who love nothing more than to puff on the team's corproate cigar, well
Hmmm, seems like another pot shot at ES. LOL
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is online now   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
 
Page generated in 0.61059 seconds with 10 queries