View Single Post
Old 05-25-2007, 03:02 PM   #13
saden1
MVP
 
saden1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 46
Posts: 10,069
Re: Conf. Championship on neutral site?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mc2guy View Post
Isn't it the point to get homefield advantage when you have the better record? What incentive does a team have to even show up for games if they have zero incentive to win after clinching their division? Imagine a team from a bad conference who has the division won by week 11 or 12. They would have 4 games with no incentive to play to win outside of pride. That makes no sense to me whatsoever.
If winning the SB isn't enough of an incentive I don't know what is. The only teams that have the luxury of sitting their players right now are those who already have 12+ wins and have already clinched a bye week...and often times these teams do in fact sit their players out which kinda washes the argument that teams will get complacent and not play towards the end of the season. The first round bye week is a huge incentive to make sure you win more games than the rest of your conference.

All I'm saying is there is a huge deal of strategy involved if the championship game was played in the neutral site too. Also, this kind of structure works for the NCAA so I don't see how it's a totally bad thing.
__________________
"The Redskins have always suffered from chronic organizational deformities under Snyder."

-Jenkins
saden1 is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
 
Page generated in 1.10590 seconds with 10 queries