Commanders Post at The Warpath - View Single Post

12thMan · 06-27-2007, 01:58 PM

If you're talking about our current line, I would say top 10, one could make an argument for top 15.

My reasoning for saying top 10 is for obvious reasons: You line up Portis he's a 1300 yd rusher; You line up Betts, he goes over a 1,000 yds too.

If you break down the line by position, one could say we're pretty solid at every position. But I just don't think you can have a losing record and at the same time claim an offensive line that's better than 10.

When healthy Samuels and Jansen are two of the best in the business. Ditto Randy Thomas. He's not only Pro-Bowl material, but is usually pretty durable.

06-27-2007, 01:58 PM	#13
12thMan MVP Join Date: May 2005 Location: washington, D.C. Posts: 11,460	Re: Rank our OLine among the 32 teams If you're talking about our current line, I would say top 10, one could make an argument for top 15. My reasoning for saying top 10 is for obvious reasons: You line up Portis he's a 1300 yd rusher; You line up Betts, he goes over a 1,000 yds too. If you break down the line by position, one could say we're pretty solid at every position. But I just don't think you can have a losing record and at the same time claim an offensive line that's better than 10. When healthy Samuels and Jansen are two of the best in the business. Ditto Randy Thomas. He's not only Pro-Bowl material, but is usually pretty durable.