|
Re: Ok, I don't care if its for depth...we cant have Stinkston!
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsarno
Why Pinkston when we could have had Keyshawn Johnson?
|
I actually would have been more concerned with signing Keyshawn. You don't sign someone like Key as camp fodder or as 4th or 5th receiver. Signing him would have been a clear sign that the team is genuinely concerned about his WR situation.
At least with Pinkston, there's still a good possibility he's just another body
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
|