Re: Not To Be Negative...
Quote:
Originally Posted by sandtrapjack
I would like to add one more thing that I hope you dont take negatively.
PASS COVERAGE. Look, McNabb was inaccurate as hell last night. But that does not take away from the fact that he had recievers in a open spot in the defense. If he completed half of the passes he made these poor throws on, the outcome of this game may have been much different.
The press coverage was great and had McNabb running for his life. But when the defense switched to a zone coverage, there were open recievers.
McNabb was WAY off his game and over/under threw a majority of his targets.
There are better passers coming up in your schedule then what you saw last night, and those QB's will HIT those targets, unlike McNabb.
|
I think you make a legitimate point, especially when you consider the best receivers for the eagles are kevin curtis and reggie brown. I don't think they scare anybody. We're going to have to tighten it up. I WAS happy to see Carlos Rogers up on the line. Nothing worse then seeing a ten yard cushion before the ball is even snapped. I'm sure G. Williams is aware of it though and we'll have a better idea where we're at after next week's game. The giants d does suck but they can throw the ball. Hopefully we shut them down.
All of that said, I think you have to apply alot of your post to your own team. Cowboys defense is nowhere what it needs to be for you to be considered the div champ just yet. That offense on the other hand...
__________________
"All natural institutions of churches, whether Jewish, Christian, or Turkish, appear to me no other than human inventions, set up to terrify and enslave mankind, and monopolize power and profit."
Thomas Paine
|