[holcknowsbest]

i enjoy reading this post every week, thanks 70 chip. i dont agree with it all, alot but not all. sometimes he goes on assumptions or does not take into effect circumstances. i will say this, i enjoyed reading his cover 3 post a couple weeks back, and i know he cant elaborate too much but that kind of cover 3 is the most basic form. i would have liked to see him explain the basic version, then maybe a more complicated version like clouds which could help explain rolling coverages and how you can still play man in the cover 3 scheme. i do appreciate the analysis though, very thorough.