Quote:
Originally Posted by Gmanc711
As for Mike Sellers, he's just far to important as a blocker to get the ball in that situation, is how I think the coaches saw it. When you're running behind 45, most times you're going to get into the endzone, so I think thats a big reason why he was not the guy called upon.
|
I was one of the people that thought Sellers should have gotten a shot to run it up the gut last week, but after Gibbs explained his reasoning, it made a lot of sense. If the best running play requires the best blocking back, that by all means, let him lead block. It still bugs me though, that Gibbs
doesn't think that the best running play requires the best running back on the team to be successful.