Quote:
Originally Posted by jsarno
So why do you think that is?
|
It had to do with Romo and Campbell being more illusive and able to move around and know what to do with the ball instead of being scared and get happy feet and throw incompelitions. Warner made the O line for Arizona look better than the first half because of his knowledge and experience and delivered the ball on time and on target.
Quote:
|
So you're saying that every team should be without a kicker, cause if they can't convert and score a TD on every possession they aren't as good as the other team? Teams have a kicker for a reason, and field goals are in the game for a reason.....
|
NO I am not saying that, but I am saying that the Titan's D kept the team in the game and eventually won it. All you were saying is that they lucked out and won ONLY by being lucky. Young and the offense scored enough points and the defense stopped the opposing team enough to win them the game.
Quote:
|
Not yet he's not. He COULD be, but that's an "if" for another discussion. Trust me, the way the media exhaults this kid and the way he could do no wrong in Nashville...people think he's the second coming of Jesus alright....
|
Yeah the media does portray QB to be more than what they are, but that is the case with all QBs. You think Tom Brady will win as many games if he plays with the Browns. You said it before, it a team effort to win, but the media makes it sound like Manning, Brady, Palmer are the only reason why their team wins. I think it has to do with the QBs touching the ball almost every offensive posession.
Quote:
|
You definitely have a point, it's the W's. So what will you say if the Titans win only 6 or 7 games? (my prediction 8 max, but likely 7.)
|
Well, if that "8 max, but likely 7" W's are more than Leinart's what would you say then?