View Single Post
Old 09-30-2004, 03:47 PM   #13
FRPLG
MVP
 
FRPLG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 10,164
Quote:
Originally Posted by offiss
The only changes I would like to see are, the down by contact rule, which is absolute nonesense, and if a challenge is inconclusive you should not be charged a time out, inconclusive mean's that the challenger could very well be right, but because of camera angle you can't tell, I believe that should be a wash, I then want younger referee's on the field, and they also have to be in top shape, they should have to pass a physical test, as well as an eye test, I don't know why we have guy's who can't get out of their own way, and probably can't pass an eye exam for a drivier's license, on the field decieding the outcome of games? It's like the NFL has gone to WWF for ref's.
The down by contact rule is a joke but I can't think of a good way to change it. I guess the reason the rule works the way it does is so a player doesn't pick up a fumbled ball and score while everyone else sits with their thumbs up their butts since they heard the whistle. Problem is, if they tell refs to curtail the quick whistles then we'll start seeing guys getting piled on after their down and there doesn't seem to be a good way to augment to rules to make this more defense friendly. I guess maybe they should get rid of the crappy refs like my man says.

Good idea on the inconclusive replays but then the refs are left to decide when the replay is inconclusive and when the challenge was just plain wrong. Now we expect these dunces to get this right also? Man this starts the ball tumbling down the mountain.
FRPLG is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
 
Page generated in 0.15359 seconds with 10 queries