Commanders Post at The Warpath - View Single Post - Bills and Pats-vs-Dallas

12thMan · 10-09-2007, 09:52 AM

Some of you guys are homers to no end. The Cowboys are good, can't you see that? And what is this bullshit about, they have to beat NE before they're considered a good team? Really, losing one game to a great team means the Cowboys are pretenders? It makes no sense. I'm not defending the Cowboys, but we can be irrational sometimes.

Listen, if Buffalo can't ante up after 6 turnovers, it says more about them than the Cowboys. Romo had a bad game. The Cowboys had a bad game, and they still won. You're going to win a few ugly ones. And the arugument about the combined records of their opponents means nothing to me. You have to strap on your helmet and earn it every Sunday in the NFL. At kickoff all that shit goes out the window. They're still undefeated. It's really that simple.

10-09-2007, 09:52 AM	#25
12thMan MVP Join Date: May 2005 Location: washington, D.C. Posts: 11,460	Re: Bills and Pats-vs-Dallas Some of you guys are homers to no end. The Cowboys are good, can't you see that? And what is this bullshit about, they have to beat NE before they're considered a good team? Really, losing one game to a great team means the Cowboys are pretenders? It makes no sense. I'm not defending the Cowboys, but we can be irrational sometimes. Listen, if Buffalo can't ante up after 6 turnovers, it says more about them than the Cowboys. Romo had a bad game. The Cowboys had a bad game, and they still won. You're going to win a few ugly ones. And the arugument about the combined records of their opponents means nothing to me. You have to strap on your helmet and earn it every Sunday in the NFL. At kickoff all that shit goes out the window. They're still undefeated. It's really that simple.