Commanders Post at The Warpath - View Single Post

MTRedskinsFan · 10-19-2007, 01:07 AM

Once again, a Skins fan creates an embarassing debate. S. Moss isn't even half the receiver R. Moss is. Our Moss is inconsistent, injury-prone, and too small to be more than one-dimensional. As of this season Moss is becoming a liability on the field, so much so that Thrash, McCardell or Caldwell could all easily be starting over him.

R. Moss, like him or not, is one of the greatest receivers over the last two decades. He plays a huge roll in almost every game. Even if he is not catching a lot of passes like in the Dallas game he requires so much coverage that he gives other guys big opportunities. He will play a huge roll in NE winning the SB.

Meanwhile, our Moss requires little coverage since middle of last season because he is constantly "hurting" and has lousy hands.

10-19-2007, 01:07 AM	#9
MTRedskinsFan Registered User Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 359	Re: Santana vs. Randy Once again, a Skins fan creates an embarassing debate. S. Moss isn't even half the receiver R. Moss is. Our Moss is inconsistent, injury-prone, and too small to be more than one-dimensional. As of this season Moss is becoming a liability on the field, so much so that Thrash, McCardell or Caldwell could all easily be starting over him. R. Moss, like him or not, is one of the greatest receivers over the last two decades. He plays a huge roll in almost every game. Even if he is not catching a lot of passes like in the Dallas game he requires so much coverage that he gives other guys big opportunities. He will play a huge roll in NE winning the SB. Meanwhile, our Moss requires little coverage since middle of last season because he is constantly "hurting" and has lousy hands.