Commanders Post at The Warpath - View Single Post - Are we 4-2 because of Gibbs, or in spite of him?

paulskinsfan · 10-23-2007, 07:50 PM

So, the defense is back and it is run totally by GW. The offense goes through Saunders, but if we have the lead then Gibbs greatly influences the playcalling to be more conservative. If GW is calling all the defense, and Saunders calls the plays until we get a lead, that begs the question: Are we 4-2 because of Joe, or in spite of him?

10-23-2007, 07:50 PM	#1
paulskinsfan Registered User Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: West VA Posts: 726	Are we 4-2 because of Gibbs, or in spite of him? So, the defense is back and it is run totally by GW. The offense goes through Saunders, but if we have the lead then Gibbs greatly influences the playcalling to be more conservative. If GW is calling all the defense, and Saunders calls the plays until we get a lead, that begs the question: Are we 4-2 because of Joe, or in spite of him?